Fuel Dumps and Spirals: Are We Just Accepting Speculation as Fact?

Taken by me in Nottinghamshire from 7.55pm until 8.05pm


On 24th March 2025, I witnessed something in the sky that changed everything for me. A glowing spiral appeared out of nowhere—perfectly formed, symmetrical, and slowly drifting across the evening sky. It didn’t flicker, it didn’t disperse like vapour, and it certainly didn’t behave like anything I’ve ever been told a “rocket fuel dump” should.

Naturally, I questioned it.

And like clockwork, media outlets were quick to explain it away—“believed to be a SpaceX fuel dump.” The wording stood out to me instantly. Not confirmed, not tracked, not explained by SpaceX. Just believed. And apparently, belief is all that’s needed to wrap up a story like this.

But let’s take a step back and ask the bigger question:

Have any of these spirals ever actually been confirmed as rocket fuel dumps?

I’m not talking about headlines. I’m not talking about vague expert guesses. I mean clear, direct, public confirmation from the companies launching these rockets. Evidence. Flight data. Matching visuals. Anything solid.

And here’s the truth:

They haven’t been confirmed.

Not one of them. Not publicly. Not directly. Not with verifiable evidence.


The Norway Spiral – 2009

One of the most famous spiral sightings in history. It lit up the skies over Norway with a giant glowing vortex and a piercing blue beam shooting from the centre.

The story?
A failed Russian missile test.

Russia admitted there was a failed launch—but they never released any visual data, never showed a failed stage, and never claimed responsibility for the spiral.

And yet, it’s now widely accepted that the spiral was caused by that failure. Why? Because it was convenient.


Credit to Todd Salat @ Aurorahunter.com

The Alaska Spiral – 2023

Seen glowing in the aurora-lit skies, this spiral looked eerily familiar. The narrative?
Likely a SpaceX fuel dump.
But again, SpaceX said nothing. No confirmation. No matching footage from the launch.

It looked like spirals we’ve seen before, so they gave it the same label.


So Why Do We Keep Accepting “Fuel Dump” as the Default?

Because it’s easy. Because it sounds scientific. Because it keeps people from looking too closely.

But when you break down the speeds, timing, distances, and behaviour of what we’re seeing—it doesn’t line up.

Rockets travel at 17,400 mph in orbit. If a spiral shows up 2 hours after launch, 4,000 miles away, that doesn’t add up. The object should be on the other side of the planet—not hanging perfectly in the sky, slowly spinning, fading with precision.

So unless these rockets are hitting the brakes mid-space (they’re not), the official explanation fails its own math test.

Leave a comment